Have You been Injured By Yaz?Yaz, Yasmin, Beyaz and Ocella side effects complication include:
- Blood clots
- Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
- Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
- Heart attack
- Gall Bladder problems
- Gall Bladder Removal
Yaz Birth Control Pills Helpline LawyersYaz Birth Control Pills Helpline is seeking all women with blood clots, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis or strokes from Yaz to encourage them to file their Yaz lawsuits before it is to late. Bayer has set aside funds to compensate for injuries but, you must move quickly as the statute of limitations is running in your state. Yaz is a birth control pills that has been show to cause moving blood clots in young women. When these clots end up in the lungs they can cause a pulmonary embolism. When they end up in the brain they can cause a stroke. When they are in the legs they are called deep vein thrombosis. But, they may not stay there and if they travel to other locations it can be deadly. If you or a daughter, wife, sister, mother or friend has been injured by Yaz you must or encourage them to file a Yaz lawsuit. We must seek justice and protect others.
Bayer agrees to settle Yasmin, Yaz Gallbladder lawsuitsBayer’s latest annual financial report shows the company has spent nearly $1 billion to settle around 4,800 claims alleging Yaz blood clots, and will continue to evaluate new claims for settlement on a case-by-case basis.
- Embedment and Perforation of the Uterine Wall
- Migration from Uterus into Intestines and Abdomen with perforation
- Mirena IUD causes Ectopic Pregnancy
- Mirena IUD can cause Infertility
- Surgical Intervention to Remove IUD, including Hysterectomy as well other permanent disability
- Potential Death
Bayer is the manufacturer of both the Mirena IUD and Yaz birth control pills. Yaz has had 1000's of lawsuits filed for blood clots, Pulmonary embolism and strokes. Bayer has settled the first round of lawsuits. Now we have the Mirena IUD.
Women Are Filing Mirena IUD Lawsuits For Uterine Perforation
We are receiving calls daily from women coming forward to file Mirena IUD lawsuits for injury, primarily uterine perforation,for their Mirena IUD. Mirena IUD lawyers claim that Bayer failed to properly investigate the risks and side effects before releasing the Mirena IUD onto the market. Women are claiming the company failed to adequately warn them and doctors about these risks. Bayer over-promoted the benefits through its “Simple Style” program, which claimed Mirena increased intimacy and helped women look and feel great.
The first Mirena IUD lawsuit was filed on April 12, 2012, on behalf of an Ohio woman. Her complaint alleged that she required a hysteroscopy to remove the device. Considering over two million women have used Mirena in the U.S. We feel many more women will be coming forward seeking justice for injuries.
- Device migration
- Embedment in the uterine wall
- Uterine perforations
- Intestinal perforations or obstruction
If you a wife, sister, friend, mother or anyone you know has been injured by the Mirena IUD have them call us for information regarding ther Mirena lawsuits.
The Mirena IUD is another dangerous device harming women. Mirena IUD lawyers are filing lawsuits nationwide for Mirena IUD injury under these circumstances. Effective immediately Mirena Iud lawyers are only accepting Mirena lawsuits for:
- The Mirena IUD Must have been surgically removed
- The Mirena IUd must have gravitated, moved and changed position
- The Mirena IUD perforated a nearby organ
- The Mirena IUD became embedded in the Uterus
- The embedment of the Mirena IUD in the uterine wall, and perforation of the uterine wall or cervix
- The Mirena has caused Inflammation of the membrane that lines the abdominal cavity and internal organs (Peritonitis)
- The Mirena has caused Intestinal perforations or obstruction
NOTE; EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER FIRST 2012 LAWYERS ARE ONLY ACCEPTING MIRENA IUD CASES FOR PERFORATION OF THE UTERUS OR NEARBY ORGANS. Please see a physician and fins out if that is why you are having these complications. We understand and sympathize with your situation but, cannot change the legal rules of science which mean that your complications must be easily connected to the IUD.
If you or a loved one has a Mirnea IUD and has experienced any of these medical problems call our Mirena IUD Helpline lawyers today to discuss a potenial Mirena IUD lawsuit.
Yaz given to many young Poor women for Birth Control. Yaz Lawsuit Settlements have Begun for Lawyers Filing Blood Clots, Pulmonary Emblism and stroke Lawsuits from Yaz. Planned Parenthood cannot be blamed for A manufactures negligence. We wonder if this massive administering of birth control is a good idea. Wisconsin, North Carolina, Tennessee and Indiana, in addition to Texas, have all moved to block Planned Parenthood from receiving taxpayer money. Planned Parenthood id an important aide to the communiies for which it Provides Womans services.
Texas cannot exclude Planned Parenthood from health program-judge
Publish date: Apr 30, 2012
Last Updated: 2012-04-30 18:35:20 -0400 (Reuters Health)
AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) – A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked a new Texas rule that would have excluded Planned Parenthood clinics from offering women's health services for the poor in the state because the organization provides abortions.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel in favor of Planned Parenthood means thousands of women enrolled in the Texas Women's Health Program who go to its clinics will not be required to find new healthcare providers, at least for now.
"The court is particularly influenced by the potential for immediate loss of access to necessary medical services by several thousand Texas women," Yeakel said in a 24-page ruling.
The preliminary injunction is a big win for Planned Parenthood, which has been under siege in several states by abortion opponents. In the past year alone, states including Wisconsin, North Carolina, Tennessee and Indiana, in addition to Texas, have all moved to block Planned Parenthood from receiving taxpayer money.
"For many women, we are the only doctor's visit they will have this year," Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement. "This ruling affirms what women have known all along: politics simply doesn't have a place in women's health."
The state Health and Human Services Commission will comply with the order and will work with the state attorney general to determine its next steps, spokeswoman Stephanie Goodman said.
"We remain confident that federal law gives states the right to establish criteria for Medicaid providers," Goodman said.
Texas Governor Rick Perry and some Republican lawmakers have said they would rather eliminate the women's healthcare program entirely than direct money to Planned Parenthood clinics.
The Texas program, which is part of the federal-state Medicaid program, provides cancer screenings, birth control and other health services to more than 100,000 low-income women.
The program does not pay for abortions or allow abortion providers to participate in the program. The new Texas state rule would ban program money from going to affiliates of abortion providers.
BAN ON AFFILIATES
State law has included that ban on affiliates since the program began in 2007, but the state did not enforce it. Texas notified the federal government last year that it intended to begin enforcing the ban, effectively excluding Planned Parenthood from the program.
According to Planned Parenthood, about 49% of the women who received services through the program in 2010 obtained some services through a Planned Parenthood provider. Planned Parenthood said it would lose about $13.5 million of annual funding for preventive care and family planning if the rule is applied, forcing it to close clinics and lay off staff.
Texas has already made deep cuts in other family-planning programs. As a result, state subsidies that once provided low-cost birth control to 220,000 women a year now cover fewer than 60,000 women a year.
The federal government pays for 90% of the cost of the Texas Women's Health Program, which serves low-income women of reproductive age who do not qualify for regular Medicaid coverage. Texas puts up just $4 million a year.
Critics object to Planned Parenthood receiving taxpayer money, which cannot be used to provide abortions, arguing that a steady stream of government grants provide an indirect subsidy by helping pay utility bills and keep doctors on staff.
Planned Parenthood is the nation's largest abortion provider, terminating about 330,000 pregnancies a year.
It gets about a third of its revenue – $360 million in 2009 – from government grants to provide birth control, gynecological exams and care for sexually transmitted diseases to low-income women.
Yaz has been shown to cause pulmonary embolism, Blood clots and Stroke in young women. Yaz lawyers Filing yaz Blood clot lawsuits.
FDA advisory panel recommends stronger warning for drospirenone-containing birth control
Publish date: Dec 16, 2011
An FDA advisory panel has recommended that some oral contraceptives may need stronger warning labels, according to recent reports.
The day-long joint meeting of the Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee of FDA was to involve discussion on the risks and benefits of drospirenone-containing birth control pills because of emerging safety concerns over the potentially higher risk of venous thromboembolism associated with these drugs compared with levonorgestrel-containing drugs, according to FDA meeting materials.
The committee heard testimony on research results from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of a family of drospirenone-containing birth control pills, including Yaz and Yasmin. Research results presented by Bayer demonstrated no increased risk of blood clots, which conflicted with other studies that found evidence that drospirenone was associated with higher risk of blood clot formation.
Although 15 of FDA's 26 expert advisors voted that the benefits of these birth control pills outweighed the risk of blood clots, 21 of the 26 panelists voted that the current labels for Bayer's drospirenone-containing combination oral contraceptives do not adequately reflect the products’ risk benefit profile and should be revised to include additional information from available studies, said a statement from Bayer.
In September, FDA released a statement informing the public that it remained concerned about the potential increased risk of blood clots with the use of drospirenone-containing birth control pills. The agency scheduled the meeting after several studies demonstrated conflicting results.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Vice President and Head of US Medical Affairs Pamela A. Cyrus, MD, said, "We thank the Committee members for their efforts and participation in the discussion on the benefit-risk profile for drospirenone-containing combination oral contraceptives.” The company added that it will continue to work with FDA and other regulatory authorities to make label updates as appropriate.